4.5 Article

The Influence of Extractable Organic Matter on Pore Development in the Late Triassic Chang 7 Lacustrine Shales, Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin, China

Journal

ACTA GEOLOGICA SINICA-ENGLISH EDITION
Volume 92, Issue 4, Pages 1508-1522

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1755-6724.13640

Keywords

lacustrine shale; pore development; extraction; shale gas; Chang 7; Ordos Basin

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [41502144, 41503034]
  2. Foundation of the State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing [PRP/open-1612]
  3. Fund of the Education Department of Sichuan Province [16ZA0075]
  4. Youth Scientific Innovation Team of Hydrocarbon Accumulation and Geochemistry, Southwest Petroleum University [2015CXTD02]
  5. Sichuan Province University Scientific Innovation Team Construction Project (USITCP)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To investigate the influence of extractable organic matter (EOM) on pore evolution of lacustrine shales, Soxhlet extraction, using dichloromethane, was performed on a series of Chang 7 shale samples (Ordos Basin, China) with vitrinite reflectance of 0.64% to 1.34%. Low-pressure gas adsorption experiments were conducted on the samples before and after extraction. The pore structure parameters were calculated from the gas adsorption data. The results show complex changes to the pore volumes and surface areas after extraction. The pore development of both the initial and extracted samples is strongly controlled by total organic carbon (TOC) content. Micropores developed mainly in organic matter (OM), while mesopores and macropores predominantly developed in fractions other than OM. The influence of EOM on micropores is stronger than on mesopores and macropores. Organic solvents with a higher boiling point should be used to explore the effect of EOM on pore structure in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available