4.8 Article

Characterizing the antitumor response in mice treated with antigen-loaded polyanhydride microparticles

Journal

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages 5583-5589

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.11.001

Keywords

Polyanhydride; Antitumor immune response; Microparticles; Biodegradable polymer; Antigen

Funding

  1. American Cancer Society [RSG-09-015-01-CDD]
  2. National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health [1R21CA128414-01A2/UI, SPORE/2P50CA097274-11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Delivery of vaccine antigens with an appropriate adjuvant can trigger potential immune responses against cancer leading to reduced tumor growth and improved survival. In this study, various formulations of a bioerodible amphiphilic polyanhydride copolymer based on 1,8-bis(p-carboxyphenoxy)-3,6-dioxaoctane (CPTEG) and 1,6-bis(p-carboxyphenoxy) hexane (CPH) with inherent adjuvant properties were evaluated for antigen-loading properties, immunogenicity and antitumor activity. Mice were vaccinated with 50:50 CPTEG:CPH microparticles encapsulating a model tumor antigen, ovalbumin (OVA), in combination with the Toll-like receptor-9 agonist, CpG oligonucleotide 1826 (CpG ODN). Mice treated with OVA-encapsulated CPTEG:CPH particles elicited the highest CD8(+) T cell responses on days 14 and 20 when compared to other treatment groups. This treatment group also displayed the most delayed tumor progression and the most extended survival times. Particles encapsulating OVA and CpG ODN generated the highest anti-OVA IgG(1) antibody responses in mice but these mice did not show significant tumor protection. These results suggest that antigen-loaded CPTEG:CPH microparticles can stimulate antigen-specific cellular responses and could therefore potentially be used to promote antitumor responses in cancer patients. (c) 2012 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available