4.8 Article

Contributions of aging to the fatigue crack growth resistance of human dentin

Journal

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages 2737-2746

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.03.046

Keywords

Anisotropy; Dentin; Fatigue crack growth; Fracture

Funding

  1. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research [NIH R01 DE016904]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An evaluation of the fatigue crack resistance of human dentin was conducted to identify the degree of degradation that arises with aging and the dependency on tubule orientation. Fatigue crack growth was achieved in specimens of coronal dentin through application of Model cyclic loading and over clinically relevant lengths (0 <= a <= 2 mm). The study considered two directions of cyclic crack growth in which the crack was either in-plane (0 degrees) or perpendicular (90 degrees) to the dentin tubules. Results showed that regardless of tubule orientation, aging of dentin is accompanied by a significant reduction in the resistance to the initiation of fatigue crack growth, as well as a significant increase in the rate of incremental extension. Perpendicular to the tubules, the fatigue crack exponent increased significantly (from m = 14.2 +/- 1.5 to 24.1 +/- 5.0), suggesting an increase in brittleness of the tissue with age. For cracks extending in-plane with the tubules, the fatigue crack growth exponent does not change significantly with patient age (from m = 25.4 +/- 3.03 to 22.9 +/- 5.3), but there is a significant increase in the incremental crack growth rate. Regardless of age, coronal dentin exhibits the lowest resistance to fatigue crack growth perpendicular to the tubules. While there are changes in the cyclic crack growth rate and mechanisms of cyclic extension with aging, this tissue maintains its anisotropy. (C) 2012 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available