- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Implementing shared decision-making: consider all the consequences
Authors
Keywords
Collaborative deliberation, Shared decision making, Patient-centered care, Implementation, Practice improvement, Quality improvement, Multilevel, Conceptual model, Measurement
Journal
Implementation Science
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2016-08-08
DOI
10.1186/s13012-016-0480-9
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Can shared decision-making reduce medical malpractice litigation? A systematic review
- (2015) Marie-Anne Durand et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- A Randomized Controlled Effectiveness Trial for PSA Screening Decision Support Interventions in Two Primary Care Settings
- (2015) Carmen L. Lewis et al. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Association of Actual and Preferred Decision Roles With Patient-Reported Quality of Care
- (2015) Kenneth L. Kehl et al. JAMA Oncology
- Shared Decision Making and Motivational Interviewing: Achieving Patient-Centered Care Across the Spectrum of Health Care Problems
- (2014) G. Elwyn et al. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE
- Peering into the black box: a meta-analysis of how clinicians use decision aids during clinical encounters
- (2014) Kirk D Wyatt et al. Implementation Science
- Where Is the Evidence? A Systematic Review of Shared Decision Making and Patient Outcomes
- (2014) L. Aubree Shay et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Collaborative deliberation: A model for patient care
- (2014) Glyn Elwyn et al. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
- Do Interventions Designed to Support Shared Decision-Making Reduce Health Inequalities? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- (2014) Marie-Anne Durand et al. PLoS One
- Team-training in healthcare: a narrative synthesis of the literature
- (2014) Sallie J Weaver et al. BMJ Quality & Safety
- Undetermined impact of patient decision support interventions on healthcare costs and savings: systematic review
- (2014) T. Walsh et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Establishing the effectiveness of patient decision aids: key constructs and measurement instruments
- (2013) Karen R Sepucha et al. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
- “Many miles to go …”: a systematic review of the implementation of patient decision support interventions into routine clinical practice
- (2013) Glyn Elwyn et al. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
- An Effort To Spread Decision Aids In Five California Primary Care Practices Yielded Low Distribution, Highlighting Hurdles
- (2013) Grace A. Lin et al. HEALTH AFFAIRS
- Patient And Family Engagement: A Framework For Understanding The Elements And Developing Interventions And Policies
- (2013) Kristin L. Carman et al. HEALTH AFFAIRS
- Introducing Decision Aids At Group Health Was Linked To Sharply Lower Hip And Knee Surgery Rates And Costs
- (2012) David Arterburn et al. HEALTH AFFAIRS
- Shared Decision Making — The Pinnacle of Patient-Centered Care
- (2012) Michael J. Barry et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Building the Path to Accountable Care
- (2011) Elliott S. Fisher et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Shared Treatment Decision Making Improves Adherence and Outcomes in Poorly Controlled Asthma
- (2009) Sandra R. Wilson et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
- Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: Update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions
- (2008) France Légaré et al. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
- Systematic Review of the Effects of Shared Decision-Making on Patient Satisfaction, Treatment Adherence and Health Status
- (2008) E.A.G. Joosten et al. PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started