4.3 Article

What's burning got to do with it? Primate foraging opportunities in fire-modified landscapes

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
Volume 159, Issue 3, Pages 432-441

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.22885

Keywords

optimal foraging models; behavioral ecology; vervets; feeding ecology

Funding

  1. Leakey Foundation General Grant, Vervet Foraging Strategies in Fire-Altered Landscapes, Loskop, South Africa

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectivesAnecdotal and formal evidence indicate that primates take advantage of burned landscapes. However, little work has been done to quantify the costs and benefits of this behavior. Using systematic behavioral observations from a population of South African vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus aethiops pygerythrus), we evaluate differences in food availability and energetics before and after controlled burns altered vegetation near their home range. We aim to determine whether burned habitats offer improved foraging opportunities. MethodsWe collected feeding data from foraging individuals and analyzed common plant foods for their energetic content. We then used the feeding and energetic data to calculate postencounter profitabilities and encounter rates for food types. Using negative binomial and mixed linear regression models we compared data from burned and unburned habitats. ResultsOur results show significantly improved encounter rates in burned landscapes for two prey items, invertebrates and grasses. However, postencounter profitabilities in burned areas were not significantly different than those achieved in unburned areas. ConclusionsResults suggest that improved encounters alone can motivate changes in foraging behavior. These foraging benefits enable the exploitation of burned savanna habitats, likely driving postburn range expansions observed among populations of vervet monkeys. Thus quantified, these results may serve as a foundation for hypotheses regarding the evolution of fire-use in our own lineage. Am J Phys Anthropol 159:432-441, 2016. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available