4.0 Article Proceedings Paper

Using high-performance quantitative NMR (HP-qNMRA®) for certifying traceable and highly accurate purity values of organic reference materials with uncertainties <0.1 %

Journal

ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages 91-98

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00769-012-0944-9

Keywords

Quantitative NMR; qNMR; Purity determination; Traceability; Certification; Uncertainty; Organic reference materials; CRM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance (qNMR) in combination with metrological weighing is optimised to demonstrate the power of the qNMR measurement method. It is shown that with H-1-qNMR it is possible to certify the purity of organic reference materials (expressed as mass fraction) with relative expanded uncertainties of < 0.1 % for a 95 % confidence interval (k = 2). Following well-defined selection criteria, a set of twelve different chemical compounds is evaluated and certified to serve as internal references for H-1-qNMR measurements. A series of comparison measurements is made amongst a subset of the selected compounds. The purity of maleic acid is determined by six different H-1-qNMR measurement series, and all results show full consistency. All the six mean values are covered within the range of +/- 0.05 %. In two more measurement series, four different nuclei are analysed within the same sample against one calibrator. Even with non-optimised signal intensity ratios and varying signal pattern, a high consistency was obtained. Therefore, the validity and robustness of H-1-qNMR measurement results are demonstrated. H-1-qNMR measurement results are directly traceable to a variety of internationally accepted primary reference materials, and therefore, traceability to SI units is obtained. All experiments are performed under ISO/IEC 17025 and ISO Guide 34 accreditation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available