Voting with their Mice: Personal Genome Testing and the “Participatory Turn” in Disease Research
Published 2011 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Voting with their Mice: Personal Genome Testing and the “Participatory Turn” in Disease Research
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages 132-147
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Online
2011-05-14
DOI
10.1080/08989621.2011.575032
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Garage biotech: Life hackers
- (2010) Heidi Ledford NATURE
- Personal genomics and individual identities: motivations and moral imperatives of early users
- (2010) Michelle L. McGowan et al. NEW GENETICS AND SOCIETY
- A Survey of UK Public Interest in Internet-Based Personal Genome Testing
- (2010) Lynn F. Cherkas et al. PLoS One
- Web-Based, Participant-Driven Studies Yield Novel Genetic Associations for Common Traits
- (2010) Nicholas Eriksson et al. PLoS Genetics
- Direct-To-Consumer Genetics and Health Policy: A Worst-Case Scenario?
- (2009) Timothy Caulfield AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS
- Social Networkers' Attitudes Toward Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome Testing
- (2009) Amy L. McGuire et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS
- Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Failure Is Not an Option
- (2009) RB Altman CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
- Personal genomics services: whose genomes?
- (2009) David Gurwitz et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- The Scientific Foundation for Personal Genomics: Recommendations from a National Institutes of Health–Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Multidisciplinary Workshop
- (2009) Muin J Khoury et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Characteristics of users of online personalized genomic risk assessments: Implications for physician-patient interactions
- (2009) Colleen M McBride et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Health care provider and consumer awareness, perceptions, and use of direct-to-consumer personal genomic tests, United States, 2008
- (2009) Katherine Kolor et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Evaluating the utility of personal genomic information
- (2009) Morris W Foster et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Genetic Risk Prediction — Are We There Yet?
- (2009) Peter Kraft et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Children and Population Biobanks
- (2009) D. Gurwitz et al. SCIENCE
- Next generation disparities in human genomics: concerns and remedies
- (2009) Anna C. Need et al. TRENDS IN GENETICS
- A Critical Appraisal of the Scientific Basis of Commercial Genomic Profiles Used to Assess Health Risks and Personalize Health Interventions
- (2008) A. Cecile J.W. Janssens et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study
- (2008) David Kaufman et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- The Evidence Dilemma In Genomic Medicine
- (2008) Muin J. Khoury et al. HEALTH AFFAIRS
- An Unwelcome Side Effect of Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome Testing
- (2008) Amy L. McGuire et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- The Genome Gets Personal—Almost
- (2008) W. Gregory Feero JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Misdirected precaution
- (2008) Barbara Prainsack et al. NATURE
- Letting the Genome out of the Bottle — Will We Get Our Wish?
- (2008) David J. Hunter et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: more questions than benefits?
- (2008) Heidi C Howard et al. Personalized Medicine
- Rhode Islanders’ attitudes towards the development of a statewide genetic biobank
- (2008) Roberta E Goldman et al. Personalized Medicine
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started