4.6 Article

Teaching Empathy to Medical Students: An Updated, Systematic Review

Journal

ACADEMIC MEDICINE
Volume 88, Issue 8, Pages 1171-1177

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318299f3e3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Junior Association for the Study of Medical Education (JASME) medical elective bursary
  2. Gilchrist Educational Grant for Academically Outstanding Individuals
  3. Doubleday Fund award
  4. Johns Hopkins University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose Some research shows that empathy declines during medical school. The authors conducted an updated, systematic review of the literature on empathy-enhancing educational interventions in undergraduate medical education. Method The authors searched PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science (January 1, 2004 through March 19, 2012) using key words related to undergraduate medical education and empathy. They independently selected and reviewed all English-language articles that described an educational intervention designed to promote empathy in medical students, assessing the quality of the quantitative studies using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI). Results The authors identified and reviewed the full texts of 18 articles (15 quantitative and 3 qualitative studies). Included interventions used one or more of the followingpatient narrative and creative arts (n = 7), writing (n = 3), drama (n=1), communication skills training (n = 4), problem-based learning (n = 1), interprofessional skills training (n = 1), patient interviews (n = 4), experiential learning (n = 2), and empathy-focused training (n = 1). Fifteen articles reported significant increases in empathy. Mean effect size was 0.23. Mean MERSQI scorewas 10.13 (range 6.5-14). Conclusions These findings suggest that educational interventions can be effective in maintaining and enhancing empathy in undergraduate medical students. In addition, they highlight the need for multicenter, randomized controlled trials, reporting long-term data to evaluate the longevity of intervention effects. Defining empathy remains problematic, and the authors call for conceptual clarity to aid future research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available