4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Intravenous Lipid Emulsion as Antidote Beyond Local Anesthetic Toxicity: A Systematic Review

Journal

ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages 815-824

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00499.x

Keywords

lipid emulsion; resuscitation; toxicity; antidote

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: The objective was to asses the efficacy of lipid emulsion as antidotal therapy outside the accepted setting of local anesthetic toxicity. Methods: Literature was accessed through PubMed, OVID (1966-February 2009), and EMBASE (1947-February 2009) using the search terms intravenous AND [fat emulsion OR lipid emulsion OR Intralipid] AND [toxicity OR resuscitation OR rescue OR arrest OR antidote]. Additional author and conference publication searches were undertaken. Publications describing the use of lipid emulsion as antidotal treatment in animals or humans were included. Results: Fourteen animal studies, one human study, and four case reports were identified. In animal models, intravenous lipid emulsion (ILE) has resulted in amelioration of toxicity associated with cyclic antidepressants, verapamil, propranolol, and thiopentone. Administration in human cases has resulted in successful resuscitation from combined bupropion/lamotrigine-induced cardiac arrest, reversal of sertraline/quetiapine-induced coma, and amelioration of verapamil- and beta blocker-induced shock. Conclusions: Management of overdose with highly lipophilic cardiotoxic medications should proceed in accord with established antidotal guidelines and early poisons center consultation. Data from animal experiments and human cases are limited, but suggestive that ILE may be helpful in potentially lethal cardiotoxicity or developed cardiac arrest attributable to such agents. Use of lipid emulsion as antidote remains a nascent field warranting further preclinical study and systematic reporting of human cases of use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available