4.1 Article

Differentiation of small (a parts per thousand currency sign2 cm) hepatocellular carcinomas from small benign nodules in cirrhotic liver on gadoxetic acid-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images

Journal

ABDOMINAL IMAGING
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages 64-75

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-014-0188-8

Keywords

Hepatocellular carcinoma; Liver magnetic resonance image (MRI); Gadoxetic acid; Diffusion-weighted MRI; American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (AASLD) guidelines

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To identify imaging characteristics that differentiate small (a parts per thousand currency sign2 cm) HCCs from small (a parts per thousand currency sign2 cm) benign nodules in cirrhotic liver on gadoxetic acid-enhanced and diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) images. On gadoxetic acid-enhanced and DW MR images, we analysed signal intensity of 222 small HCCs and 61 benign nodules (diameter, 0.5-2 cm) at each sequence and rim enhancement during portal or equilibrium phases. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified predictors of HCC. Combinations of significant MR findings in multivariate analysis were compared with American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (AASLD) practice guidelines. In multivariate analysis, arterial enhancement (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 8.6), T2 hyperintensity (aOR, 5.8), and hyperintensity on DW images (aOR, 3.8) were significant for differentiating small HCCs from benign nodules (p a parts per thousand currency sign 0.004). When two or all three findings were applied as diagnostic criteria for differentiating small HCCs from benign nodules, sensitivity and accuracy were significantly higher compared with AASLD practice guidelines (91% vs. 78% and 89% vs. 81%, respectively; each p < 0.0001). On gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging, arterial enhancement and hyperintensity on T2-weighted and DW MR images are helpful for differentiating small HCCs from benign nodules in liver cirrhosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available