4.4 Article

Fusion of piggyBac-like transposons and herpesviruses occurs frequently in teleosts

Journal

ZOOLOGICAL LETTERS
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s40851-018-0089-8

Keywords

Endogenous viral elements; Herpesvirus; Transposon; piggyBac; Teleosts

Categories

Funding

  1. CREST, JST [JPMJCR13W3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Endogenous viral elements play important roles in eukaryotic evolution by giving rise to genetic novelties. Herpesviruses are a large family of DNA viruses, most of which do not have the ability to endogenize into host genomes. Recently, we identified a novel type of endogenous herpesvirus, which we named Teratorn, from themedaka (Oryzias latipes) genome, in which the herpesvirus is fused with a piggyBac-like DNA transposon, forming a novel mobile element. Teratorn is a unique herpesvirus that retains its viral genes intact and has acquired the endogenized lifestyle by hijacking the transposon system. However, it is unclear how this novel element evolved in the teleost lineage and whether fusion of two mobile elements is a general phenomenon in vertebrates. Results: Here we performed a comprehensive genomic survey searching for Teratorn-like viruses in publicly available genome data and found that they are widely distributed in teleosts, forming a clade within Alloherpesviridae. Importantly, at least half of the identified Teratorn-like viruses contain piggyBac-like transposase genes, suggesting the generality of the transposon-herpesvirus fusion in teleosts. Phylogenetic tree topologies between the piggyBac-like transposase gene and herpesvirus-like genes are nearly identical, supporting the idea of a long-term evolutionary relationship between them. Conclusion: We propose that piggyBac-like elements and Teratorn-like viruses have co-existed for a long time, and that fusion of the two mobile genetic elements occurred frequently in teleosts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available