4.1 Article

Introduction into the NHS of magnetic sphincter augmentation: an innovative surgical therapy for reflux - results and challenges

Journal

ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND
Volume 100, Issue 4, Pages 251-256

Publisher

ROYAL COLL SURGEONS ENGLAND
DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2017.0224

Keywords

Reflux; Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation; NICE

Categories

Funding

  1. Torax Medical

Ask authors/readers for more resources

INTRODUCTION Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is a common, chronic debilitating condition. Surgical management traditionally involves fundoplication. Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is a new definitive treatment. We describe our experience of introducing this innovative therapy into NHS practice and report the early clinical outcomes. METHODS MSA was introduced into NHS practice following successful acceptance of a cost-effective business plan and close observation of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommendations for new procedures, including a carefully planned prospective data collection over a two-year follow-up period. RESULTS Forty-seven patients underwent MSA over the 40-month period. Reflux health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) was significantly improved after the procedure and maintained at one-and two-year (P < 0.0001) follow-up. Drug dependency went from 100% at baseline to 2.6% and 8.7% after one and two years. High levels of patient satisfaction were reported. There were no adverse events. CONCLUSIONS MSA is highly effective in the treatment of uncomplicated GORD, with durable results and an excellent safety profile. This laparoscopic, minimally invasive procedure provides a good alternative for patients where surgical anatomy is unaltered. Our experience demonstrates that innovative technology can be incorporated into NHS practice with an acceptable business plan and compliance with NICE recommendations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available