4.6 Article

Competition between sympatric wolf taxa: an example involving African and Ethiopian wolves

Journal

ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.172207

Keywords

Canis lupaster; Canis simensis; interference competition; exploitative competition; carnivore conservation

Funding

  1. CEES
  2. University of Oslo
  3. Norwegian Quota Scheme
  4. Rufford Small Grants Foundation
  5. Mohamed Bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund
  6. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  7. US-Norway Fulbright Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carnivore populations are declining globally due to range contraction, persecution and prey depletion. One consequence of these patterns is increased range and niche overlap with other carnivores, and thus an elevated potential for competitive exclusion. Here, we document competition between an endangered canid, the Ethiopian wolf (EW), and the newly discovered African wolf (AW) in central Ethiopia. The diet of the ecological specialist EW was dominated by rodents, whereas the AW consumed a more diverse diet also including insects and non-rodent mammals. EWs used predominantly intact habitat, whereas AWs used mostly areas disturbed by humans and their livestock. We observed 82 encounters between the two species, of which 94% were agonistic. The outcomes of agonistic encounters followed a territory-specific dominance pattern, with EWs dominating in intact habitat and AWs in human-disturbed areas. For AWs, the likelihood of winning encounters also increased with group size. Rodent species consumed by EWs were also available in the human-disturbed areas, suggesting that these areas could be suitable habitat for EWs if AWs were not present. Increasing human encroachment not only affects the prey base of EWs, but also may impact their survival by intensifying competition with sympatric AWs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available