4.7 Article

Diverse Volumetric Faulting Patterns in the San Jacinto Fault Zone

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH
Volume 123, Issue 6, Pages 5068-5081

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2017JB015408

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [EAR-1551411, EAR-1722561]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We examine locations, magnitudes, and faulting types of post-2000 earthquakes in the trifurcation area of San Jacinto fault zone to clarify basic aspects of failure processes in the area. Most M3.5 events have strike-slip mechanisms, occur within 1km of the main faults (Clark, Buck Ridge, and Coyote Creek), and have hypocenter depths of 10-13km. In contrast, many smaller events have normal source mechanisms and hypocenters in intrafault areas deeper than 13km. Additional small events with hypocenter depth <13km occur in off-fault regions and have complex geometries including lineations normal to the main faults. Five moderate earthquakes with M 4.7-5.4 have high aftershock rates (similar to 150 M1.5 events within 1day from the mainshock). To obtain more details on aftershock sequences of these earthquakes, we detect and locate additional events with the matched filter method. There are almost no aftershocks within 1km from the mainshocks, consistent with large mainshock stress drops and low residual stress. The five aftershock sequences have almost no spatial overlap. While the mainshocks are on the main faults, most aftershocks are located in intrafault and off-fault regions. Their locations and spatial distribution reflect the mainshock rupture directions, and many also follow structures normal to the main faults. The significant diversity of observed features highlights the essential volumetric character of failure patterns in the area. The increasing rate of moderate events, productive aftershock sequences, and large inferred stress drops may reflect processes near the end of a large earthquake cycle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available