4.6 Article

On the Climate Impacts of Upper Tropospheric and Lower Stratospheric Ozone

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
Volume 123, Issue 2, Pages 730-739

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2017JD027398

Keywords

UTLS ozone; intermodel discrepancy; high cloud fraction; stratospheric temperature; stratospheric water vapor; radiative forcing

Funding

  1. Discovery Program of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada [RGPIN 418305-13]
  2. Team Research Project Program of the Fonds de recherche Nature et technologies of Quebec [PR-190145]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of China [41375072, 41530423]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The global warming simulations of the general circulation models (GCMs) are generally performed with different ozone prescriptions. We find that the differences in ozone distribution, especially in the upper tropospheric and lower stratospheric (UTLS) region, account for important model discrepancies shown in the ozone-only historical experiment of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5). These discrepancies include global high cloud fraction, stratospheric temperature, and stratospheric water vapor. Through a set of experiments conducted by an atmospheric GCM with contrasting UTLS ozone prescriptions, we verify that UTLS ozone not only directly radiatively heats the UTLS region and cools the upper parts of the stratosphere but also strongly influences the high clouds due to its impact on relative humidity and static stability in the UTLS region and the stratospheric water vapor due to its impact on the tropical tropopause temperature. These consequences strongly affect the global mean effective radiative forcing of ozone, as noted in previous studies. Our findings suggest that special attention should be paid to the UTLS ozone when evaluating the climate effects of ozone depletion in the 20th century and recovery in the 21st century. UTLS ozone difference may also be important for understanding the intermodel discrepancy in the climate projections of the CMIP6 GCMs in which either prescribed or interactive ozone is used.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available