4.1 Article

Preeclamptic plasma stimulates the expression of miRNAs, leading to a decrease in endothelin-1 production in endothelial cells

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.preghy.2018.03.001

Keywords

Endothelial cells; Endothelin-1; miRNAs; Plasma; Preeclampsia

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq-Brazil) [131125/2014-1, 305587/2014-5]
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP-Brazil) [2013/12919-9]
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [13/12919-9] Funding Source: FAPESP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Preeclampsia is a major cause of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality worldwide. It is a multisystem pregnancy syndrome characterized by general endothelial dysfunction caused mainly by plasma factors and debris in endothelial cells. It is widely accepted that endothelin-1 (ET-1) is involved in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia, and so it is of interest to ascertain whether the ET-1 gene (EDN1) can be targeted with tools such as miRNAs. Therefore, we investigated the relationship between the expression of miRNAs that putatively target EDN1 (and so affect ET-1 levels) in HUVECs incubated with plasma from preeclamptic women. EDN1 expression and ET-1 levels in HUVECs incubated with plasma from women with preeclampsia were similar to those in plasma from healthy pregnant women. Expression of miRNAs let-7a, -7b, and -7c, and to a lesser degree 125a and 125b, was increased in preeclampsia. Expression of miRNAs of the let-7 family was significantly negatively correlated with ET-1 levels in preeclampsia. Transfection of the preeclampsia cultures with mimic miRNA let-7 decreased ET-1 levels. Our findings show that preeclamptic plasma stimulates the expression of miRNAs in HUVECs, leading to a decrease in ET-1levels, which suggests that therapeutic miRNAs may aid in the management of preeclampsia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available