4.4 Article

The NASA Task Load Index as a measure of overall workload among neonatal, paediatric and adult intensive care nurses

Journal

INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING
Volume 46, Issue -, Pages 64-69

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2018.01.004

Keywords

Factor analysis; ICU; NASA; Neonatal; Nurse; Workload; Paediatric

Categories

Funding

  1. Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
  2. Health Services Research Dissertation Grant from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [1 R36 HS14517]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: The NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) is a subjective workload assessment scale developed for use in aviation and increasingly applied to healthcare. The scale purports to measure overall workload as a single variable calculated by summing responses to six items. Since no data address the validity of this scoring approach in health care, we evaluated the single factor structure of the NASA-TLX as a measure of overall workload among intenisive care nurses. Methods: Confirmatory factor analysis of data from two studies of nurse workload in neonatal, paediatric, and adult intensive care units. Study 1 data were obtained from 136 nurses in one neonatal intensive care unit. Study 2 data were collected from 300 nurses in 17 adult, paediatric and neonatal units. Nurses rated their workload using the NASA-TLX's paper version. Results: A single factor model testing whether all six items measured a single overall workload variable fit least well (RMSEA = 0.14; CFI = 0.91; TLI = 0.85). A second model that specified two items as outcomes of overall workload had acceptable fit (RMSEA = 0.08; CFI = 0.97; TLI = 0.95) while a third model of four items fit best (RMSEA = 0.06; CFI > 0.99; TLI = 0.99). Conclusion: A summed score from four of six NASA-TLX items appears to most reliably measure a single overall workload variable among intensive care nurses. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available