4.6 Article

Dual Autoencoder Network for Retinex-Based Low-Light Image Enhancement

Journal

IEEE ACCESS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages 22084-22093

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2812809

Keywords

Autoencoder; image processing; image enhancement; neural networks; variational retinex model; unsupervised learning

Funding

  1. Institute for Information & Communications Technology Promotion grant through the Korea government [2017-0-00250]
  2. Intelligent Defense Boundary Surveillance Technology Using Collaborative Reinforced Learning of Embedded Edge Camera and Image Analysis
  3. Institute for Information & Communication Technology Planning & Evaluation (IITP), Republic of Korea [2017-0-00250-002] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [21B20130011122] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a dual autoencoder network model based on the retinex theory to perform the low-light enhancement and noise reduction by combining the stacked and convolutional autoencoders. The proposed method first estimates the spatially smooth illumination component which is brighter than an input low-light image using a stacked autoencoder with a small number of hidden units. Next, we use a convolutional autoencoder which deals with 2-D image information to reduce the amplified noise in the brightness enhancement process. We analyzed and compared roles of the stacked and convolutional autoencoders with the constraint terms of the variational retinex model. In the experiments, we demonstrate the performance of the proposed algorithm by comparing with the state-of-the-art existing low-light and contrast enhancement methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available