4.6 Article

A Novel Network Security Risk Assessment Approach by Combining Subjective and Objective Weights under Uncertainty

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app8030428

Keywords

network security; risk assessment; D-S evidence theory; objective weights; uncertainty measure

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61703338, 61671384]
  2. Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China [2016JM6018]
  3. Project of Science and Technology Foundation
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [3102017OQD020]
  5. National Training Program of Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Undergraduates [201710699190]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nowadays, computer networks are playing a more and more important role in people's daily lives. Meanwhile, the security of computer networks has also attracted widespread concern. However, up to now, there is no universal and effective assessment approach for computer network security. Therefore, a novel network security risk assessment approach by combining subjective and objective weights under uncertainty is proposed. In the proposed evaluation approach, the uncertainty of evaluation data is taken into account, which is translated into objective weights through an uncertainty measure. By combining the subjective weights of evaluation criteria and the objective weights of evaluation data, the final weights can be obtained. Then, Dempster-Shafer (D-S) evidence theory and pignistic probability transformation (PPT) are employed to derive a consensus decision for the degree of the network security risk. Two illustrative examples are given to show the efficiency of the proposed approach. This approach of risk assessment, which combines subjective and objective weights, can not only effectively evaluate computer network security, but also be widely used in decision-making.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available