3.8 Article

Poly-L-lactic acid-co-poly(pentadecalactone) Electrospun Fibers Result in Greater Neurite Outgrowth of Chick Dorsal Root Ganglia in Vitro Compared to Poly-L-lactic Acid Fibers

Journal

ACS BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages 1491-1497

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00013

Keywords

electrospun fibers; mechanical property; surface topography; dorsal root ganglia; neurite outgrowth; neural engineering

Funding

  1. NSF CAREER Award (BMAT) Grant [1150125]
  2. R01 (NINDS) [NS092754]
  3. NSF CAREER Award (CBET) [0954990]
  4. NSF Division of Materials Research (NSF-DMR) (BMAT) Grant [1508422]
  5. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program [DGE-1247271]
  6. Division Of Materials Research
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1150125] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Division Of Materials Research
  9. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1508422] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrospun poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) fiber scaffolds are used to direct axonal extension in neural engineering models. We aimed to improve the efficacy of these fibers in promoting neurite outgrowth by altering surface topography and reducing fiber elastic modulus through the incorporation of a compatibilized blend, poly-L-lactic acid-poly(pentadecalactone) (PLLA-PPDL) into the solution prior to electrospinning. PLLA+PLLA-PPDL fibers had a larger diameter, increased surface nanotopography, and lower glass transition temperature than PLLA fibers but had similar mechanical properties. Increases in neurite outgrowth on PLLA+PLLA-PPDL fibers were observed, potentially due to the significantly increased diameter and surface coverage with nanotopography. Ultimately, these results suggest that greater electrospun fiber diameter and surface topography may contribute to increases in neurite outgrowth.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available