4.4 Article

A Techno-Economic Assessment of Renewable Diesel and Gasoline Production from Aspen Hardwood

Journal

WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages 2745-2760

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12649-018-0359-x

Keywords

Aspen woodchip; Techno-economic model; Fast pyrolysis; Hydroprocessing; Renewable diesel; Gasoline

Funding

  1. North West Upgrading, Inc. (NWRP) [RES0015306]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [IRCPJ 436795, 436794-2011, NSERC CRDPJ 434956-12]
  3. Cenvous Energy Endowed Chair in Environmental Engineering

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we developed a techno-economic model to estimate the production cost of renewable diesel and gasoline from aspen woodchips through fast pyrolysis-based bio-oil and its subsequent hydroprocessing. The whole pathway includes the conversion of woodchip biomass to bio-oil through fast pyrolysis followed by upgrading to transportation fuels via hydroprocessing. Experiments were carried out to develop for the process model. This detailed process and techno-economic study was done based on 2000 dry t day(-1) aspen woodchips (base case capacity), from which we estimated the cost to produce renewable diesel and gasoline. For this base case, using the present method, 148.81 ML year(-1) of renewable diesel and 99.21 ML year(-1) of gasoline using merchant hydrogen can be produced. The production costs of renewable diesel and gasoline for 2000 t day(-1) are 1.09 and 1.04$ L-1, respectively. We also studied the effect of changing the scale of the facility from 500 to 5000 t day(-1) on the production costs of renewable diesel and gasoline. The economic optimum plant size (the capacity at which fuel production cost is lowest) was determined to be 3000 t day(-1). Finally, we carried out sensitivity and uncertainty analyses for the base case and determined that production cost is most sensitive to bio-oil yield and internal rate of return (IRR).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available