4.4 Article

On-Site Molecular Detection of Soil-Borne Phytopathogens Using a Portable Real-Time PCR System

Journal

JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS
Volume -, Issue 132, Pages -

Publisher

JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS
DOI: 10.3791/56891

Keywords

Environmental Sciences; Issue 132; On-site diagnosis; portable real-time PCR; soil-borne phytopathogens; powdery scab disease; Spongospora subterranea; Potato Mop Top Virus; Rhizoctonia solani

Funding

  1. Northwest Potato Research Consortium
  2. Washington State Department of Agriculture - Specialty Crop Block Grant Program [K1764]
  3. PPNS [0741]
  4. Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Human and Natural Resource Sciences, Agricultural Research Center, Hatch Project [WNP00833]
  5. Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

On-site diagnosis of plant diseases can be a useful tool for growers for timely decisions enabling the earlier implementation of disease management strategies that reduce the impact of the disease. Presently in many diagnostic laboratories, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), particularly real-time PCR, is considered the most sensitive and accurate method for plant pathogen detection. However, laboratory-based PCRs typically require expensive laboratory equipment and skilled personnel. In this study, soil-borne pathogens of potato are used to demonstrate the potential for on-site molecular detection. This was achieved using a rapid and simple protocol comprising of magnetic bead-based nucleic acid extraction, portable real-time PCR (fluorogenic probe-based assay). The portable real-time PCR approach compared favorably with a laboratorybased system, detecting as few as 100 copies of DNA from Spongospora subterranea. The portable real-time PCR method developed here can serve as an alternative to laboratory-based approaches and a useful on-site tool for pathogen diagnosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available