4.6 Article

Comparing the International Knowledge Flow of China's Wind and Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Industries: Patent Analysis and Implications for Sustainable Development

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su10061883

Keywords

wind power; solar PV; international knowledge flow; patent citation network; sustainable development

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91646102, L1724034, L16240452, L1524015, 71203117]
  2. MOE (Ministry of Education in China) Project of Humanities and Social Sciences [16JDGC011]
  3. Chinese Academy of Engineering's China Knowledge Centre for Engineering Sciences an Technology Project [CKCEST-2015-4-2, CKCEST-2017-1-10]
  4. UK-China Industry Academia Partnership Programme [UK-CIAPP260]
  5. Volvo [20153000181]
  6. Tsinghua Initiative Research Project [2016THZW]
  7. National Natural Science Foundation
  8. Chinese Academy of Engineering
  9. UK Economics and Social Research Council [ES/K006002/1]
  10. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/K006002/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. ESRC [ES/K006002/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Climate-relevant technologies, like wind and solar energy, are crucial for mitigating climate change and for achieving sustainable development. Recent literature argues that Chinese solar firms play more active roles in international knowledge flows, which may better explain their success in international markets when compared to those of Chinese wind firms; however, empirical evidence remains sparse. This study aims to explore to what extent and how do the international knowledge flows differ between China's wind and solar photovoltaic (PV) industries? From a network perspective, this paper develops a three-dimensional framework to compare the knowledge flows in both explicit and tacit dimensions: (i) inter-country explicit knowledge clusters (by topological clustering of patent citation network); (ii) inter-firm explicit knowledge flow (patent citation network of key firms); and, (iii) inter-firm tacit knowledge flow (by desktop research and interviews). The results show that China's PV industry has stronger international knowledge linkages in terms of knowledge clustering and explicit knowledge flow, but the wind power industry has a stronger tacit knowledge flow. Further, this study argues that the differences of global knowledge links between China's wind and solar PV industries may be caused by technology characteristics, market orientation, and policy implementation. This suggests that these industries both have strong connections to global knowledge networks, but they may involve disparate catch-up pathways that concern follower-modes and leader-modes. These findings are important to help us understand how China can follow sustainable development pathways in the light of climate change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available