4.6 Article

Bioinspired sea-sponge nanostructure design of Ni/Ni(HCO3)(2)-on-C for a supercapacitor with a superior anti-fading capacity

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 6, Issue 32, Pages 15781-15788

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ta05303k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21171140, 21471114, 51271132, 51771138, 91122103]
  2. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research (EPSRC) [EP/P018998]
  3. Newton Mobility Grant through Royal Society [IE161019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rational design of novel structures plays a key role in achieving high specific capacities and fast charge rates with a long cycling life for battery-type electrodes of supercapacitors. To tackle capacity fading issues of battery-type electrode materials for supercapacitors, a new approach is proposed to form a bioinspired sea-sponge nanostructure of Ni/Ni(HCO3)(2)-on-C, synthesized through modifying triangle nanoflakes of Ni(HCO3)(2) with partially in situ reduced Ni generated on sea-sponge-like porous carbon spheres (S-PCSs). The conductive skeleton of S-PCSs facilitates fast electron transfer and ion diffusion, and maintains the morphology of Ni(HCO3)(2) triangle nanoflakes to ensure a high specific capacity of Ni/Ni(HCO3)(2) nanoflakes. Simultaneously, the in situ reduced Ni acts as a capacity reservoir to prevent the fading of the specific capacity. When, applied as a positive electrode material, such sea-sponge nanostructures of Ni/Ni(HCO3)(2)-on-C exhibit a high specific capacity (472 mA h g(-1)) with a good rate capability (66% capacity retention at 32 A g(-1)vs. 8 A g(-1)), superior reversibility and cyclability (92% capacity retention after 10000 cycles). An asymmetric supercapacitor based on Ni/Ni(HCO3)(2)-on-C//S-PCSs shows a high energy density of 51.3 W h kg(-1) at a power density of 4 kW kg(-1) with a capacitance retention of 89.6% over 6000 cycles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available