4.7 Article

Assessment and Enhancement Frameworks for System Reliability Performance Using Different PEV Charging Models

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages 1969-1984

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSTE.2018.2820696

Keywords

Dynamic demand response; Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistical test; plug-in electric vehicle; power system reliability; sequential Monte Carlo simulation; time-of-use rate

Funding

  1. Majmaah University, Saudi Arabia, through the Saudi Arabian Cultural Bureau in Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a comprehensive reliability framework for incorporating different plug-in electric vehicle (PEV) charging load models into the evaluation of generation adequacy. The proposed framework comprises special treatment and innovative models to achieve an accurate determination of the impact of PEV load models on reliability. First, a goodness-of-fit statistical model determines the probability distribution functions (PDFs) that best reflect the main characteristics of driver behavior. Second, robust and detailed stochastic methods are developed for modeling different charging scenarios (uncontrolled charging and charging based on time-of-use (TOU) pricing). These models are based on the use of a Monte Carlo simulation in conjunction with the fitted PDFs to generate and assess a large number of possible scenarios, while handling the uncertainties associated with driver behavior, penetration levels, charging levels, battery capacities, and customer response to TOU pricing. A novel reliability-based framework for the application of dynamic critical event call programs for use with PEV charging loads is also proposed. The effectiveness of the proposed framework with respect to improving system reliability is demonstrated using several case studies applied on the IEEE Reliability Test System.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available