4.7 Article

An Analytical Approach to Evaluate the Reliability of Offshore Wind Power Plants Considering Environmental Impact

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 249-260

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSTE.2017.2727480

Keywords

Collector system; common cause failure; environmental effect; offshore wind power plant; reliability evaluation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51307136]
  2. State Grid Corporation in China [52094016000C]
  3. Engineering & Physical Science Research Council U.K. through the RESTORES project [EP/L014351/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The accurate quantitative reliability evaluation of off-shore wind power plants (OWPPs) is an important part in planning and helps us to obtain economic optimization. However, loop structures in collector systems and large quantities of components with correlated failures caused by shared ambient influences are significant challenges in the reliability evaluation. This paper proposes an analytical approach to evaluate the reliability of OWPPs considering environmental impact on failures and solve the challenges by protection zone models, equivalent power unit models, and common cause failure (CCF) analysis. Based on the investigation of the characteristics of OWPP and related failures mechanisms, the components are divided into three CCF subsets. With the aid of the protection zone model and equivalent power unit model merged with CCF, the faulty collector system state evaluation is applied to reduce the computational burden. The case studies present the necessity and improved performance of merging CCF analysis into modeling via the comparison with other two simplified methods. A sensitivity analysis is also carried out to account for inaccuracy of failure data. The results show that the assumption of independent failures in the conventional method might lead to over-optimistic or over-pessimistic evaluation depending on the CCF style.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available