4.7 Article

The Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS)

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING
Volume 34, Issue 10, Pages 1993-2024

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2014.2377694

Keywords

MRI; Brain; Oncology/tumor; Image segmentation; Benchmark

Funding

  1. NIH NCRR [P41-RR14075]
  2. NIH NIBIB [R01EB013565]
  3. Academy of Finland [133611]
  4. TEKES (ComBrain)
  5. Lundbeck Foundation [R141-2013-13117]
  6. Swiss Cancer League
  7. Swiss Institute for Computer Assisted Surgery (SICAS)
  8. NIH NIBIB NAMIC [U54-EB005149]
  9. NIH NCRR NAC [P41-RR13218]
  10. NIH NIBIB NAC [P41-EB-015902]
  11. NIH NCI [R15CA115464]
  12. European Research Council through ERC [MedYMA 2011-291080]
  13. FCT
  14. COMPETE [FCOM-01-0124-FEDER-022674]
  15. MICAT Project (EU) [PIRG-GA-2008-231052]
  16. European Union [600841]
  17. Swiss NSF project Computer Aided and Image Guided Medical Interventions (NCCR CO-ME)
  18. Technische Universitat Munchen-Institute for Advanced Study - German Excellence Initiative
  19. Technische Universitat Munchen-Institute for Advanced Study - European Union [291763]
  20. Marie Curie COFUND program of the European Union
  21. Academy of Finland (AKA) [133611, 133611] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)
  22. Lundbeck Foundation [R141-2013-13117] Funding Source: researchfish
  23. National Institute for Health Research [NIHR/CS/009/011] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper we report the set-up and results of the Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS) organized in conjunction with the MICCAI 2012 and 2013 conferences. Twenty state-of-the-art tumor segmentation algorithms were applied to a set of 65 multi-contrast MR scans of low-and high-grade glioma patients-manually annotated by up to four raters-and to 65 comparable scans generated using tumor image simulation software. Quantitative evaluations revealed considerable disagreement between the human raters in segmenting various tumor sub-regions (Dice scores in the range 74%-85%), illustrating the difficulty of this task. We found that different algorithms worked best for different sub-regions (reaching performance comparable to human inter-rater variability), but that no single algorithm ranked in the top for all sub-regions simultaneously. Fusing several good algorithms using a hierarchical majority vote yielded segmentations that consistently ranked above all individual algorithms, indicating remaining opportunities for further methodological improvements. The BRATS image data and manual annotations continue to be publicly available through an online evaluation system as an ongoing benchmarking resource.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available