4.3 Article

Why are COPD patients unable to complete the outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program?

Journal

CHRONIC RESPIRATORY DISEASE
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages 411-418

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1479972318767206

Keywords

COPD; pulmonary rehabilitation; patient compliance; lack of motivation; transportation problems; COPD exacerbation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to compare demographic and clinical characteristics of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients who complete and fail to complete outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) program and to determine the reasons for not completing the program. Patients with COPD referred to the PR program were divided into two groups: Those who completed the program were classified as group 1 and those who did not complete were classified as group 2, and their data were compared. Patients who failed to complete the program were contacted through phone and asked why they ceased their participation in the program. In group 2, number of smoker patients and patients using nebulizer and receiving long-term oxygen treatment, emergency admissions, and dyspnea perception were higher (p = 0.003, p < 0.001, p = 0.033, p = 0.011, p < 0.001, respectively); forced expiratory volume in one second (%) value, exercise capacity, and quality of life were lower (p = 0.024, p = 0.001, p = 0.014, respectively). When considered from the sociodemographic perspective, group 2 had a lower education level and a higher rate of living alone (p < 0.001). Factors impairing the program compliance were lack of motivation (49.0%), transportation problems (23.8%), COPD exacerbation (18.4%), work-related reasons (4.8%), and hospitalization (4.1%), respectively. Smokers and severe COPD patients fail to complete PR program due to various reasons, especially lack of motivation. It is very important for health practitioners to inform patients accurately and adopt a positive attitude.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available