4.6 Article

Topical Application of Culture-Expanded CD34+Umbilical Cord Blood Cells from Frozen Units Accelerates Healing of Diabetic Skin Wounds in Mice

Journal

STEM CELLS TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages 591-601

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/sctm.17-0302

Keywords

Umbilical cord blood; Diabetes; Skin ulcer; Stem cells

Funding

  1. Center for the Commercialization of Regenerative Medicine [001]
  2. Insception-LifeBank [003]
  3. Stem Cell Network [13/5226 (CT74)]
  4. [CIHR-PPP110824]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chronic and nonhealing wounds are constant health issues facing patients with type 2 diabetes. As the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) increases, the incidence of chronic wounds and amputations will rise. T2DM is associated with peripheral arterial occlusive disease, which leads to the development of nonhealing skin ulcers after minor trauma. Patients develop severe pain limiting their mobility and ability to work and take care of themselves, thus putting a significant burden on the family and society. CD34+ cells from umbilical cord blood (UCB) grown in fibroblast growth factor-4 (FGF-4), stem cell factor, and Flt3-ligand produced a population of cells that have the ability to proliferate and develop properties enabling them to enhance tissue regeneration. The goal of this study was to assess in vitro cultured CD34+ cells in a setting where they would eventually be rejected so we could isolate paracrine signaling mediated therapeutic effect from the therapeutic effect due to engraftment and differentiation. To achieve this, we used db/db mice as a model for diabetic skin ulcers. Here, we report that in vitro cultured UCB CD34+ cells from frozen units can accelerate wound healing and resulted in the regeneration of full thickness skin. This study demonstrates a new indication for banked UCB units in the area of tissue regeneration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available