4.7 Article

Discovery of Ranking Fraud for Mobile Apps

Journal

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TKDE.2014.2320733

Keywords

Mobile Apps; ranking fraud detection; evidence aggregation; historical ranking records; rating and review

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [61325010]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [71329201]
  3. Science and Technology Development of Anhui Province [1301022064]
  4. US National Science Foundation (NSF) [CCF-1018151, IIS-1256016]
  5. UNC [2014-2015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ranking fraud in the mobile App market refers to fraudulent or deceptive activities which have a purpose of bumping up the Apps in the popularity list. Indeed, it becomes more and more frequent for App developers to use shady means, such as inflating their Apps' sales or posting phony App ratings, to commit ranking fraud. While the importance of preventing ranking fraud has been widely recognized, there is limited understanding and research in this area. To this end, in this paper, we provide a holistic view of ranking fraud and propose a ranking fraud detection system for mobile Apps. Specifically, we first propose to accurately locate the ranking fraud by mining the active periods, namely leading sessions, of mobile Apps. Such leading sessions can be leveraged for detecting the local anomaly instead of global anomaly of App rankings. Furthermore, we investigate three types of evidences, i.e., ranking based evidences, rating based evidences and review based evidences, by modeling Apps' ranking, rating and review behaviors through statistical hypotheses tests. In addition, we propose an optimization based aggregation method to integrate all the evidences for fraud detection. Finally, we evaluate the proposed system with real-world App data collected from the iOS App Store for a long time period. In the experiments, we validate the effectiveness of the proposed system, and show the scalability of the detection algorithm as well as some regularity of ranking fraud activities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available