4.6 Article

Simulations to benchmark time-varying connectivity methods for fMRI

Journal

PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006196

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse (SE) grant [2016.0473]
  2. Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsradet) [2016-03352, 773 013-61X-08276-26-4]
  3. Swedish e-Science Research Center
  4. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through Severo Ochoa Programme for Centres/Units of Excellence in RD [SEV-2015-490]
  5. Swedish Research Council [2016-03352] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is a current interest in quantifying time-varying connectivity (TVC) based on neuroimaging data such as fMRI. Many methods have been proposed, and are being applied, revealing new insight into the brains dynamics. However, given that the ground truth for TVC in the brain is unknown, many concerns remain regarding the accuracy of proposed estimates. Since there exist many TVC methods it is difficult to assess differences in time-varying connectivity between studies. In this paper, we present tvc_benchmarker, which is a Python package containing four simulations to test TVC methods. Here, we evaluate five different methods that together represent a wide spectrum of current approaches to estimating TVC (sliding window, tapered sliding window, multiplication of temporal derivatives, spatial distance and jackknife correlation). These simulations were designed to test each methods ability to track changes in covariance over time, which is a key property in TVC analysis. We found that all tested methods correlated positively with each other, but there were large differences in the strength of the correlations between methods. To facilitate comparisons with future TVC methods, we propose that the described simulations can act as benchmark tests for evaluation of methods. Using tvc_benchmarker researchers can easily add, compare and submit their own TVC methods to evaluate its performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available