4.3 Article

Effect of C/N Ratio on the Removal of Nitrogen and Microbial Characteristics in the Water Saturated Denitrifying Section of a Two-Stage Constructed Rapid Infiltration System

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15071469

Keywords

two-stage constructed rapid infiltration system; water-saturated denitrifying section; C/N ratio; denitrifying bacteria; extracellular polymeric substances

Funding

  1. Chinese National Natural Science Foundations [41502333]
  2. Sichuan science and technology support project [2017JY0141, 2018GZ0416]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M610598, 2018T110963]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection Foundation [SKLGP2016Z019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to improve the removal of nitrogen pollutants from artificial sewage by a modeled two-stage constructed rapid infiltration (CRI) system. The C/N ratio of the second stage influent was elevated by addition of glucose. When the C/N ratio was increased to 5, the mean removal efficiency of total nitrogen (TN) reached up to 75.4%. Under this condition, the number of denitrifying bacteria in the permanently submerged denitrifying section (the second stage) was 22 times higher than that in the control experiment without added glucose. Elevation of the C/N ratio resulted in lower concentrations of nitrate and TN in the second stage effluent, without impairment of chemical oxygen demand removal. The concentration of nitrate and TN in effluent decreased as the abundance of denitrifying bacteria increased. Moreover, the bacterial biofilms that had formed in the sand of the second stage container were analyzed. The secretion of extracellular polymeric substances, a major constituent of biofilms, was enhanced as a result of the elevated C/N ratio, which lead to the improved protection of the bacteria and enhanced the removal of pollutants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available