4.5 Article

Genetic diversity of the Chinese goat in the littoral zone of the Yangtze River as assessed by microsatellite and mtDNA

Journal

ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 8, Issue 10, Pages 5111-5123

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4100

Keywords

diversity; goat; microsatellite; mitochondrial DNA; Yangtze River

Funding

  1. Characteristic Germplasm Resources Population Selection and Innovation on Mutton Sheeps and Goats [2015BAD03B05]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [SWU114023, XDJK2017A003]
  3. People's Livelihood Special Innovation Projects of CQ CSTC [cstc2016shmszx80064]
  4. Innovation Team Building Program in Chongqing universities [CXTDG201602004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to assess the genetic diversity and population structure of goats in the Yangtze River region using microsatellite and mtDNA to better understand the current status of those goat genetic diversity and the effects of natural landscape in fashion of domestic animal genetic diversity. The genetic variability of 16 goat populations in the littoral zone of the Yangtze River was estimated using 21 autosomal microsatellites, which revealed high diversity and genetic population clustering with a dispersed geographical distribution. A phylogenetic analysis of the mitochondrial D-loop region (482bp) was conducted in 494 goats from the Yangtze River region. In total, 117 SNPs were reconstructed, and 173 haplotypes were identified, 94.5% of which belonged to lineages A and B. Lineages C, D, and G had lower frequencies (5.2%), and lineage F haplotypes were undetected. Several high-frequency haplotypes were shared by different ecogeographically distributed populations, and the close phylogenetic relationships among certain low-frequency haplotypes indicated the historical exchange of genetic material among these populations. In particular, the lineage G haplotype suggests that some west Asian goat genetic material may have been transferred to China via Muslim migration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available