4.6 Article

Reduced Corneal Endothelial Cell Density in Patients With Dry Eye Disease

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 159, Issue 6, Pages 1022-1026

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.03.011

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH (Bethesda, Maryland) [K24-EY019098]
  2. Falk Medical Research Trust
  3. Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary Foundation (Boston, Massachusetts)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE: To evaluate corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) in patients with dry eye disease (DED) compared to an age-matched control group. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, controlled study. METHODS: This study included 90 eyes of 45 patients with moderate to severe DED (aged 53.7 +/- 9.8 years) and 30 eyes of 15 normal controls (aged 50.7 +/- 9.8 years). All subjects had a complete ophthalmic evaluation including symptom assessment using the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) and corneal fluorescein staining. In addition, laser scanning in vivo confocal microscopy was performed to measure the density of the following parameters in the central cornea: endothelial cells, subbasal nerves, and subbasal immune dendritic cells. RESULTS: Corneal ECD was significantly lower in the DED group (2595.8 +/- 356.1 cells/mm(2)) than in the control group (2812.7 +/- 395.2 cells/mm(2), P =.046). The DED group showed significantly lower corneal subbasal nerve density (17.1 +/- 6.9 mm/mm(2)) compared to the control group (24.7 +/- 4.4 mm/mm(2), P <.001). Dendritic cell density was significantly higher in the DED group than in the controls (111.7 +/- 137.3 vs 32.0 +/- 24.4 cells/mm(2), respectively, P =.002). There were statistically significant correlations between corneal ECD and dry eye severity parameters including the OSDI score (r(s) = 0.26, P =.03), and corneal fluorescein staining (r(s) = 0.28, P =.008). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant reduction in corneal ECD in DED that correlates with clinical severity of the disease. (C) 2015 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available