4.8 Article

Induction of Nitric-Oxide Metabolism in Enterocytes Alleviates Colitis and Inflammation-Associated Colon Cancer

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages 1962-1976

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.053

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Weizmann Institute
  2. European Research Program [CIG618113, ERC614204]
  3. Israel Science Foundation [1343/13, 1952/13]
  4. Minerva grant award [711730]
  5. Adelis Foundation
  6. Henry S. and Anne S. Reich Research Fund
  7. Dukler Fund for Cancer Research
  8. Paul Sparr Foundation
  9. Saul and Theresa Esman Foundation
  10. Israel Cancer Research Fund [ICRF 711982]
  11. European Research Council (IEMTx)
  12. Fondazione Telethon
  13. Baylor College of Medicine Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center Grant [1 U54 HD083092]
  14. Doris Duke Charitable Foundation [DDCF 2013095]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nitric oxide (NO) plays an established role in numerous physiological and pathological processes, but the specific cellular sources of NO in disease pathogenesis remain unclear, preventing the implementation of NO-related therapy. Argininosuccinate lyase (ASL) is the only enzyme able to produce arginine, the substrate for NO generation by nitric oxide synthase (NOS) isoforms. Here, we generated cell-specific conditional ASL knockout mice in combination with genetic and chemical colitis models. We demonstrate that NO derived from enterocytes alleviates colitis by decreasing macrophage infiltration and tissue damage, whereas immune cell-derived NO is associated with macrophage activation, resulting in increased severity of inflammation. We find that induction of endogenous NO production by enterocytes with supplements that upregulate ASL expression and complement its substrates results in improved epithelial integrity and alleviation of colitis and of inflammation-associated colon cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available