4.6 Article

Perspective: Total, Added, or Free? What Kind of Sugars Should We Be Talking About?

Journal

ADVANCES IN NUTRITION
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages 63-69

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/advances/nmx020

Keywords

sugar; health; recommendations; labeling; regulation

Funding

  1. Unilever

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is consistent public guidance to limit sugars intakes. However, WHO recommendations are for free sugars, whereas some other guidance documents and public discussion focus on added sugars, and globally most food labeling states total sugars. Total sugars comprise all monoand disaccharides, regardless of source, whereas both added and free sugars exclude the sugars that naturally occur in dairy products and intact fruit and vegetables. Definitions of added and free sugars differ mainly in their respective exclusion or inclusion of sugars in juiced or pureed fruit and vegetables. To date, there has been little evidence-based analysis of the scientific basis for these different sugar classifications or implications of their adoption for consumer communication and nutrition labeling. Evidence of discriminating relations of total compared with added or free sugars with weight gain or energy intake, type 2 diabetes, and dental caries was identified from recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The relations were weakest for total sugars and most consistent for dietary sources corresponding to free sugars (including sugars added to and in fruit juices). Consideration of these health outcomes suggests that the emphasis for intake monitoring, public health guidance, and consumer communication should be on free sugars. However, at present, the adoption of free sugars for these purposes would also carry challenges related to implementation, including consumer understanding, consensus on specifications, and current (labeling) regulations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available