4.4 Article

FOXM1: A potential indicator to predict lymphatic metastatic recurrence in stage IIA esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Journal

THORACIC CANCER
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages 997-1004

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.12776

Keywords

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; FOXM1; lymphatic metastatic recurrence; prognosis

Funding

  1. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China [ZR2017MH089]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundPrevious studies have elucidated that FOXM1 may predict poor prognosis in patients with multiple solid malignant tumors. In this study we explored the differential expression of FOXM1 in stage IIA esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and investigated its prognostic value. MethodsImmunohistochemistry (IHC) and Western blot were used to detect FOXM1 expression in ESCC. Correlations between FOXM1 expression and clinicopathological variables, and five-year lymphatic metastatic recurrence (LMR) and overall survival (OS) of patients were analyzed. ResultsFOXM1 was aberrantly expressed in ESCC. Statistical analysis revealed a close relationship between FOXM1 expression and tumor size (P = 0.024), depth of invasion (P = 0.048), and degree of differentiation (P = 0.043). The five-year LMR of patients in the FOXM1 overexpression group was significantly increased compared to the low expression group (P = 0.001). The five-year OS of patients in the FOXM1 overexpression group was significantly reduced compared to the low expression group (P = 0.007). Log-rank tests demonstrated that large tumor size (P = 0.044), poor differentiation degree (P = 0.005), deep invasion (P = 0.000), and FOXM1 overexpression (P = 0.007) may indicate poor prognosis in stage IIA ESCC. Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed that all of these variables were independent predictors of unfavorable outcome (P < 0.05). ConclusionFOXM1 could be a predictor of lymphatic metastatic recurrence in stage IIA ESCC after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available