4.7 Article

Transcriptomic response of breast cancer cells to anacardic acid

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-26429-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of Louisville Center for Genetics and Molecular Medicine
  2. Office of the Executive Vice President for Research and Innovation of the University of Louisville
  3. NIH/NIGMS grant [P20 GM103436]
  4. NIH [5 T35 DK072923]
  5. University of Louisville Summer Research Opportunity Program (SROP)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anacardic acid (AnAc), a potential dietary agent for preventing and treating breast cancer, inhibited the proliferation of estrogen receptor a (ERa) positive MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 triple negative breast cancer cells. To characterize potential regulators of AnAc action, MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells were treated for 6 h with purified AnAc 24:1n5 congener followed by next generation transcriptomic sequencing (RNA-seq) and network analysis. We reported that AnAc-differentially regulated miRNA transcriptomes in each cell line and now identify AnAc-regulated changes in mRNA and lncRNA transcript expression. In MCF-7 cells, 80 AnAc-responsive genes were identified, including lncRNA MIR22HG. More AnAc-responsive genes (886) were identified in MDA-MB-231 cells. Only six genes were commonly altered by AnAc in both cell lines: SCD, INSIG1, and TGM2 were decreased and PDK4, GPR176, and ZBT20 were increased. Modeling of AnAc-induced gene changes suggests that AnAc inhibits monounsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis in both cell lines and increases endoplasmic reticulum stress in MDA-MB-231 cells. Since modeling of downregulated genes implicated NF kappa B in MCF-7, we confirmed that AnAc inhibited TNF alpha-induced NF kappa B reporter activity in MCF-7 cells. These data identify new targets and pathways that may account for AnAc's anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic activity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available