4.7 Article

The FGFR4-388arg Variant Promotes Lung Cancer Progression by N-Cadherin Induction

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-20570-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. ISCIII [PI14/01964, PIE15/00076, PI15/00045, CB16/12/00275, PI17/00033, FI12/00429]
  2. CIBER [CB16/12/00442]
  3. RTICC [R12/0036/0028]
  4. European Union (ERDF/ESF, Investing in your future)
  5. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness
  6. Consejeria de Ciencia e Innovacion [CTS-1848]
  7. Consejeria de Salud of the Junta de Andalucia [PI-0096-2014]
  8. Consejeria de Salud y Bienestar Social [PI-0046-2012]
  9. Fundacion Mutua Madrilena
  10. AECC (AIO)
  11. Consejeria de Igualdad, Salud y Politicas Sociales de la Junta de Andalucia [PI-0029-2013]
  12. FIS [PI16/01311]
  13. Ministerio de Educacion, Cultura y Deporte [FPU13/02595]
  14. PN I+D+I
  15. PE I+D+I

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The FGFR4-388Arg variant has been related to poor prognosis in several types of cancer, including lung cancer. The mechanism underlying this association has not been addressed in detail in patients with this pathology. Here, we report that this FGFR4 variant induces MAPK and STAT3 activation and causes pro-oncogenic effects in NSCLC in vitro and in vivo. This variant induces the expression of EMT-related genes, such as N-cadherin, vimentin, Snail1 and Twist1. Indeed, the induction of N-cadherin protein expression by this variant is essential for its pro-tumorigenic role. The presence of the FGFR4-388Arg variant correlates with higher N-cadherin expression levels in clinical NSCLC samples and with poorer outcome in patients with FGFR expression. These results support the prognostic role of this FGFR variant in lung cancer and show that these effects may be mediated by the induction of N-cadherin expression and an EMT phenotype.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available