Potential Reporting Bias in Neuroimaging Studies of Sex Differences
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Potential Reporting Bias in Neuroimaging Studies of Sex Differences
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Scientific Reports
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2018-04-11
DOI
10.1038/s41598-018-23976-1
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Scanning the horizon: towards transparent and reproducible neuroimaging research
- (2017) Russell A. Poldrack et al. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE
- OpenfMRI: Open sharing of task fMRI data
- (2017) Russell A. Poldrack et al. NEUROIMAGE
- Meta-assessment of bias in science
- (2017) Daniele Fanelli et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Multifaceted origins of sex differences in the brain
- (2016) Margaret M. McCarthy PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
- Beyond sex differences: new approaches for thinking about variation in brain structure and function
- (2016) Daphna Joel et al. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
- Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates
- (2016) Anders Eklund et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- NeuroVault.org: a web-based repository for collecting and sharing unthresholded statistical maps of the human brain
- (2015) Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski et al. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
- Recommendations for sex/gender neuroimaging research: key principles and implications for research design, analysis, and interpretation
- (2014) Gina Rippon et al. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
- His brain, her brain?
- (2014) C. Fine SCIENCE
- Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention
- (2014) John P.A. Ioannidis et al. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES
- Evidence of reporting biases in voxel-based morphometry (VBM) studies of psychiatric and neurological disorders
- (2013) Paolo Fusar-Poli et al. HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
- Empirical evidence for low reproducibility indicates low pre-study odds
- (2013) Katherine S. Button et al. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE
- Confidence and precision increase with high statistical power
- (2013) Katherine S. Button et al. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE
- Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
- (2013) Katherine S. Button et al. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE
- The new science of cognitive sex differences
- (2013) David I. Miller et al. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES
- Registered Reports: A new publishing initiative at Cortex
- (2012) Christopher D. Chambers CORTEX
- Ten ironic rules for non-statistical reviewers
- (2012) Karl Friston NEUROIMAGE
- A peculiar prevalence of p values just below .05
- (2012) E.J. Masicampo et al. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
- Is There Neurosexism in Functional Neuroimaging Investigations of Sex Differences?
- (2012) Cordelia Fine Neuroethics
- Excess Significance Bias in the Literature on Brain Volume Abnormalities
- (2011) John P. A. Ioannidis ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY
- The Trouble with Sex Differences
- (2011) Lise Eliot NEURON
- The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
- (2009) Alessandro Liberati et al. PLOS MEDICINE
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExplorePublish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn More