Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor With or Without Pneumatic Displacement for Submacular Hemorrhage

PURPOSE: To compare the treatment outcomes of a combination of pneumatic displacement and intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor, and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monotherapy for submacular hemorrhage resulting from exudative age-related macular degeneration. DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative, interventional case series. METHODS: Forty eyes treated with a combination therapy and 42 eyes treated with monotherapy for submacular hemorrhage resulting from exudative age-related macular degeneration with no significant difference in baseline central foveal thickness were compared. Central foveal thickness and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months after initial treatment were measured and compared between the 2 groups after adjustment of baseline central foveal thickness. RESULTS: Central foveal thickness (P < .0001) and BCVA (combination, P < .0001; monotherapy, P = .022) were improved after both treatments. Combination therapy showed more rapid improvement of central foveal thickness (P = .009) and BCVA (P = .007) within 1 month than monotherapy, but there was no difference at 6 months (P = .385 and P = .303, respectively). In eyes with subretinal hemorrhage thicker than 450 mu m, visual outcome at 6 months was better in the combination therapy group than in the monotherapy group (P = .021), whereas BCVA showed no significant difference between groups in eyes with subretinal hemorrhage less than 450 mu m (P = .930). CONCLUSIONS: Both treatments are useful options for submacular hemorrhage resulting from exudative age-related macular degeneration. Combination therapy may yield a better treatment outcome than monotherapy in eyes with thick subretinal hemorrhage. Nevertheless, the potential for adverse events resulting from pneumatic displacement should be considered. (C) 2015 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.