4.6 Article

Band Structure Effects in Extremely Scaled Silicon Nanowire MOSFETs With Different Cross Section Shapes

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES
Volume 62, Issue 11, Pages 3547-3553

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TED.2015.2475176

Keywords

Ab initio; band structure; MOSFETs; nonequilibrium Green's function (NEGF); silicon nanowire (SNW); tight-binding (TB) Hamiltonian; Wannier function

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61404094, 61574102, 61204096]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20141218]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2014CFB694]
  4. China Post-Doctoral Science Foundation [2012T50688]
  5. Fundamental Research Fund for the Central Universities, Wuhan University [2042014kf0238, 2042015kf0174]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A multiscale simulation package based on ab initio calculation is used to study the band structure effects in extremely scaled gate-all-around silicon nanowire (SNW) MOSFETs with different cross-sectional shapes. All the interactions are computed directly from ab initio method without semiempirical parameters, and the effects of crystal atom relaxations and boundary atom dangling bond saturations are included intrinsically. The tight-binding Hamiltonian is obtained from ab initio results with maximally localized Wannier functions. The device performances are obtained with nonequilibrium Green's function method. With this simulation flow, the band structure and its impacts on the device performance of SNWs with different cross-sectional shapes are studied. Simulation results show that the crystal relaxation has notable effects on the band structure with different cross-sectional shapes and sizes. The SNWs with triangular cross-sectional shape are very competitive due to a smaller average conductivity effective mass ascribed to the valley splitting at extremely scaled size.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available