4.5 Review

Are ovarian cancer stem cells the target for innovative immunotherapy?

Journal

ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages 2615-2626

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S155458

Keywords

cancer stem cells; ovarian cancer; epigenetics; tumor cell surface marker; immunotherapy; CAR

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81772772, 81302242]
  2. Jilin Province Science and Technology Funds [20150204007YY, 20140204022YY, 20150204041YY, 20160101043JC]
  3. Jilin Province Development and Reform Commission Funds [2016C046-2, 2014G073]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cancer stem cells (CSCs), a subpopulation of cancer cells with the ability of self-renewal and differentiation, are believed to be responsible for tumor generation, progression, metastasis, and relapse. Ovarian cancer, the most malignant gynecological cancer, has consistent pathology behavior with CSC model, which suggests that therapies based on ovarian cancer stem cells (OCSCs) can gain a more successful prognosis. Much evidence has proved that epigenetic mechanism played an important role in tumor formation and sustainment. Since CSCs are generally resistant to conventional therapies (chemotherapy and radiotherapy), immunotherapy is a more effective method that has been implemented in the clinic. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell, an adoptive cellular immunotherapy, which results in apparent elimination of tumor in both hematologic and solid cancers, could be used for ovarian cancer. This review covers the basic conception of CSCs and OCSCs, the implication of epigenetic mechanism underlying cancer evolution considering CSC model, the immunotherapies reported for ovarian cancer targeting OCSCs currently, and the relationship between immune system and hierarchy cancer organized by CSCs. Particularly, the promising prospects and potential pitfalls of targeting OCSC surface markers to design CAR-T cellular immunotherapy are discussed here.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available