The ICD-11 developmental field study of reliability of diagnoses of high-burden mental disorders: results among adult patients in mental health settings of 13 countries
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
The ICD-11 developmental field study of reliability of diagnoses of high-burden mental disorders: results among adult patients in mental health settings of 13 countries
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
World Psychiatry
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 174-186
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2018-06-01
DOI
10.1002/wps.20524
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- The Classification of Anxiety and Fear-Related Disorders in the ICD-11
- (2016) Cary S. Kogan et al. DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY
- The classification of Obsessive–Compulsive and Related Disorders in the ICD-11
- (2016) D.J. Stein et al. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
- Approaches to Demonstrating the Reliability and Validity of Core Diagnostic Criteria for Chronic Pain
- (2016) Stephen Bruehl et al. JOURNAL OF PAIN
- Draft diagnostic guidelines for ICD-11 mental and behavioural disorders available for review and comment
- (2016) Geoffrey M. Reed et al. World Psychiatry
- Test-retest reliability of schizoaffective disorder compared with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and unipolar depression-a systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2015) Hanno Santelmann et al. BIPOLAR DISORDERS
- Classification, assessment, prevalence, and effect of personality disorder
- (2015) Peter Tyrer et al. LANCET
- The development of the ICD-11 Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines for Mental and Behavioural Disorders
- (2015) Michael B. First et al. World Psychiatry
- Sources of Unreliability in the Diagnosis of Substance Dependence
- (2015) Richard Feinn et al. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
- A conceptual framework for the revision of the ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders
- (2015) World Psychiatry
- The Reliability of Clinical Diagnoses: State of the Art
- (2014) Helena Chmura Kraemer Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
- The Cycle of Classification: DSM-I Through DSM-5
- (2014) Roger K. Blashfield et al. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
- DSM-5 Field Trials in the United States and Canada, Part I: Study Design, Sampling Strategy, Implementation, and Analytic Approaches
- (2013) Diana E. Clarke et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
- DSM-5 Field Trials in the United States and Canada, Part II: Test-Retest Reliability of Selected Categorical Diagnoses
- (2013) Darrel A. Regier et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
- A review of the reliability and validity of OPCRIT in relation to its use for the routine clinical assessment of mental health patients
- (2013) Philip J. Brittain et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH
- Global burden of disease attributable to mental and substance use disorders: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010
- (2013) Harvey A Whiteford et al. LANCET
- Diagnosis and classification of disorders specifically associated with stress: proposals for ICD-11
- (2013) Andreas Maercker et al. World Psychiatry
- Status of Psychotic Disorders in ICD-11
- (2012) W. Gaebel SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN
- Diagnosis of schizophrenia: Consistency across information sources and stability of the condition
- (2012) Philip D. Harvey et al. SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
- Schizoaffective disorder–an ongoing challenge for psychiatric nosology
- (2010) M. Jäger et al. EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY
- Outreach and screening following the 2005 London bombings: usage and outcomes
- (2010) C. R. Brewin et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
- Cross-Cultural Study of Conviction Subtype Taijin Kyofu
- (2009) Yoshihiro Kinoshita et al. JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started