Ureteroscopy is more cost effective than shock wave lithotripsy for stone treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Ureteroscopy is more cost effective than shock wave lithotripsy for stone treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Keywords
Ureteroscopy, Shock wave lithotripsy, Cost, Effectiveness, Outcomes
Journal
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2018-05-05
DOI
10.1007/s00345-018-2320-9
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Primary SWL Is an Efficient and Cost-Effective Treatment for Lower Pole Renal Stones Between 10 and 20 mm in Size: A Large Single Center Study
- (2017) Luke H. Chan et al. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY
- Worldwide Trends of Urinary Stone Disease Treatment Over the Last Two Decades: A Systematic Review
- (2017) Robert M. Geraghty et al. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY
- Results of day-case ureterorenoscopy (DC-URS) for stone disease: prospective outcomes over 4.5 years
- (2017) Anngona Ghosh et al. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
- Trends of ‘urolithiasis: interventions, simulation, and laser technology’ over the last 16 years (2000–2015) as published in the literature (PubMed): a systematic review from European section of Uro-technology (ESUT)
- (2017) Amelia Pietropaolo et al. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
- How can and should we optimize extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?
- (2017) Christian G. Chaussy et al. Urolithiasis
- Bilateral Simultaneous Ureteroscopic (BS-URS) Approach in the Management of Bilateral Urolithiasis Is a Safe and Effective Strategy in the Contemporary Era—Evidence from a Systematic Review
- (2017) Robert M. Geraghty et al. Current Urology Reports
- Cost-effectiveness comparison of ureteral calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy
- (2016) Eugene B. Cone et al. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
- Cost-Effectiveness Comparison of Renal Calculi Treated with Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy Versus Shockwave Lithotripsy
- (2014) Eugene B. Cone et al. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY
- Comparison of ESWL and Ureteroscopic Holmium Laser lithotripsy in Management of Ureteral Stones
- (2014) Yon Cui et al. PLoS One
- Decreasing Cost of Flexible Ureterorenoscopy: Single-use Laser Fiber Cost Analysis
- (2014) R.A. Chapman et al. UROLOGY
- Stone-free rate (SFR): a new proposal for defining levels of SFR
- (2013) Bhaskar K. Somani et al. Urolithiasis
- Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm
- (2012) Ahmed R. El-Nahas et al. BJU INTERNATIONAL
- Prevalence of Kidney Stones in the United States
- (2012) Charles D. Scales et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- Cost-effectiveness and efficiency of shockwave lithotripsy vs flexible ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole renal calculi
- (2011) Vincent Koo et al. BJU INTERNATIONAL
- Cost-Effectiveness of Treating Ureteral Stones in a Taipei City Hospital: Shock Wave Lithotripsy versus Ureteroscopy plus Lithoclast
- (2009) Chi-Yi Huang et al. UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS
- A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Semirigid Ureteroscopy for the Management of Proximal Ureteral Calculi
- (2009) Hosni K. Salem UROLOGY
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
- (2008) Gordon H Guyatt et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAdd your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload Now