4.1 Article

Reproducibility, stability, and biological variability of thrombin generation using calibrated automated thrombography in healthy dogs

Journal

VETERINARY CLINICAL PATHOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages 218-226

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/vcp.12602

Keywords

Canine; hemostasis

Funding

  1. Ontario Veterinary College Pet Trust Fund [051682]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundThrombin plays a central role in hemostasis and thrombosis. Calibrated automated thrombography (CAT), a thrombin generation assay, may be a useful test for hemostatic disorders in dogs. ObjectivesTo describe CAT results in a group of healthy dogs, and assess preanalytical variables and biological variability. AnimalsForty healthy dogs were enrolled. MethodsLag time (Lag), time to peak (ttpeak), peak thrombin generation (peak), and endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) were measured. Direct jugular venipuncture and winged-needle catheter-assisted saphenous venipuncture were used to collect samples from each dog, and results were compared between methods. Sample stability at -80 degrees C was assessed over 12months in a subset of samples. Biological variability of CAT was assessed via nested ANOVA using samples obtained weekly from a subset of 9 dogs for 4 consecutive weeks. ResultsSamples for CAT were stable at -80 degrees C over 12months of storage. Samples collected via winged-needle catheter venipuncture showed poor repeatability compared to direct venipuncture samples; there was also poor agreement between the 2 sampling methods. Intra-individual variability of CAT parameters was below 25%; inter-individual variability ranged from 36.9% to 78.5%. ConclusionsMeasurement of thrombin generation using CAT appears to be repeatable in healthy dogs, and samples are stable for at least 12months when stored at -80 degrees C. Direct venipuncture sampling is recommended for CAT. Low indices of individuality suggest that subject-based reference intervals are more suitable when interpreting CAT results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available