4.6 Article

Detection of Babesia spp., Theileria spp. and Anaplasma ovis in Border Regions, northwestern China

Journal

TRANSBOUNDARY AND EMERGING DISEASES
Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages 1537-1544

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tbed.12894

Keywords

Anaplasma ovis; Babesia spp.; border; Theileria spp.; ticks

Funding

  1. National key Research AMP
  2. Development Plan [2017YFD0500304]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1503283, 81560338, 81360239]
  4. International Scientific and Technological Cooperation in Bingtuan [2016AH001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Babesia spp., Theileria spp. and Anaplasma ovis are important intracellular agents that are transmitted by tick bites. However, Babesia spp., Theileria spp. and A. ovis in ticks have not been systematically reported along the border of northwestern China. In this study, a total of 1,084 adult ticks, including 134 Haemaphysalis punctata, 337 Hyalomma asiaticum, 233 Dermacentor nuttalli, 69 Rhipicephalus turanicus and 265 Dermacentor marginatus were collected from 11 counties or cities of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. The ticks were identified from morphological and molecular characteristics. Two fragments of 18S rRNA gene were used to determine the species level of Babesia and Theileria. Msp4 gene encoding major surface protein 4 was used to determine A. ovis. Of the 1,084 samples, five species of Babesia (B. occultans, B. caballi, B. motasi, B. major and Babesia sp. detected in this study), two kinds of Theileria (Theileria ovis and Theileria sp. detected in this study) and A. ovis with six phylogenic branches were detected in the border of northwestern China. Babesia occultans, first found in China, was first molecularly detected in D. nuttalli. Babesia caballi and Babesia sp. detected in this study were first molecularly detected in Hy. asiaticum. Genotype III of A. ovis was predominant in the border regions of northwestern China.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available