4.4 Article

Atomic and Molecular Adsorption on Cu(111)

Journal

TOPICS IN CATALYSIS
Volume 61, Issue 9-11, Pages 736-750

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11244-018-0943-0

Keywords

Density functional theory; Copper; Adsorption; Catalysis; Thermochemistry

Funding

  1. DOE-BES, Office of Chemical Sciences [DE-FG02-05ER15731]
  2. Department of Energy's Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science [DE-AC02-06CH11357, DE-AC02-05CH11231]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to the wide use of copper-based catalysts in industrial chemical processes, fundamental understanding of the interactions between copper surfaces and various reaction intermediates is highly desired. Here, we performed periodic, self-consistent density functional theory (DFT-GGA) calculations to study the adsorption of five atomic species (H, C, N, O, and S), seven molecular species (NH3, CH4, N-2, CO, HCN, NO, and HCOOH), and 13 molecular fragments (CH, CH2, CH3, NH, NH2, OH, CN, COH, HCO, COOH, HCOO, NOH, and HNO) on the Cu(111) surface at a coverage of 0.25 monolayer. The preferred binding site, binding energy, and the corresponding surface deformation energy of each species were determined, as well as the estimated diffusion barrier and diffusion pathway. The binding strengths calculated using the PW91 functional decreased in the following order: CH > C > O > S > CN > NH > N > CH2 > OH > HCOO > COH > H > NH2 > NOH > COOH > HNO > HCO > CH3 > NO > CO > NH3 > HCOOH. No stable binding structures were observed for N-2, HCN, and CH4. The adsorbate-surface and intramolecular vibrational modes of all the adsorbates at their preferred binding sites were deternined. Using the calculated adsorption energetics, potential energy surfaces were constructed for the direct decomposition of CO, CO2, NO, N-2, NH3, and CH4 and the hydrogen-assisted decomposition of CO, CO2, and NO.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available