Journal
SYNTHESE
Volume 195, Issue 12, Pages 5159-5174Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-018-1713-z
Keywords
Action control; Brain-computer interface; Causal exclusion; Difference-making; Interventionism; Multiple realisability
Categories
Funding
- Finnish Academy of Science and Letters
- Waldemar von Frenckell foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Some recent arguments defending the genuine causal efficacy of the mental have been relying on empirical research on neuroprosthetics. This essay presents a critical analysis of these arguments. The problem of mental causation, and the basic idea and results of neuroprosthetics are reviewed. It is shown how appealing to the research on neuroprosthetics can be interpreted to give support to the idea of mental causation. However, it does so only in a rather deflationary sense: by holding the mental identical with the neural. So contrary to what the arguments have been assuming, neuroprosthetics cannot be used to argue for nonreductive physicalism. It can rather be taken to illustrate just the opposite: how the mental and the physical are identical.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available