4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Adrenocortical oncocytic neoplasm: A systematic review

Journal

SURGERY
Volume 164, Issue 6, Pages 1351-1359

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.04.044

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Adrenocortical oncocytic neoplasms are rare tumors, generally regarded as benign and hormonally nonfunctional. We performed a systematic review to update the literature on adrenocortical oncocytic neoplasms by reviewing patient and tumor characteristics, as well as management trends, because the literature is composed of predominately single-case reports. Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library through June 2017. Malignant potential was determined by applying the Lin-Weiss-Bisceglia criteria to cases. Results: Included for analysis were 84 citations describing 140 adrenocortical oncocytic neoplasms, including our own case. These were diagnosed predominantly in females (66%), on the left side (64%), and were nonfunctional (66%). Average age at diagnosis was 44 years (2.5-77), and median tumor size was 80 mm (16-285). A total of 35% of adrenocortical oncocytic neoplasms were benign, 41% borderline, and 24% malignant. Male patients were more likely to have a malignant tumor compared with females (36% versus 18%, P = .035). The 5-year overall survival for benign adrenocortical oncocytic neoplasms was 100%, borderline 88%, and malignant 47%. Hormonal function did not discriminate malignant from benign lesions. Adrenocortical oncocytic neoplasms that stained positive for synaptophysin (50%, P < .001) and negative for vimentin (62%, P = .009) are more often benign. Conclusion: We found that the majority of adrenocortical oncocytic neoplasms (65%) were either malignant or had malignant potential, contrary to the previous literature. The Lin-Weiss-Bisceglia criteria are useful in identifying those patients for whom closer surveillance is warranted, because their prognosis is dependent on the Lin-Weiss-Bisceglia diagnosis. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available